What are the per-mile operating costs of a high-speed rail line? And how high do fares need to be to cover those costs?
Those seem like simple metrics to answer. But as the California High-Speed Rail Authority releases its revised 2012 Business Plan, the agency has come under criticism from CC-HSR, a group of NIMBYs Peninsula residents, who accuse the agency of underestimating the operating costs:
The California High Speed Rail Authority’s claim that its future system would generate hundreds of millions of dollars in surpluses is based on unrealistic assumptions about what it will cost to operate the network, according to the study group, which included former World Bank official William Grindley and Stanford University management professor Alain C. Enthoven.
The rail authority claims it can operate the 510-mile system at a cost of about 10 cents per passenger mile, less than one-fourth of the 40 cents to 50 cents it costs high speed rail operators in other countries, the analysis found.
While there is much to criticize in the plan regarding the phasing and blending, the CC-HSR argument is not valid.
First, let’s review their methodology. CC-HSR extrapolated a 10-cent operating cost per passenger mile based on the the published $81 LA-SF premium fare, and assuming 50% profit. They compared this 10-cents number to a study done in 2007 that reports a per-mile operating cost of around 30-50 cents per mile for European high-speed rail operators.
So according to the CC-HSR, the LA-SF fares are too low, and would have to be at least triple the $81 fare just to break even. Does this argument make sense? Well, let’s look at SNCF fares for Paris-Avignon, which is exactly same distance as LA-SF. This image is a screenshot taken for a random reservation on the SNCF web site:
You are welcome to try your own trip reservations, and do the Euros to Dollars conversion — but the SNCF fares don’t seem all the far off from CHSRA fares. And if it really cost SNCF more than 30 cents/passenger mile, then the Sud-Est wouldn’t be profitable, which even CC-HSR admits is not the case.
A while ago, I was reading the CC-HSR’s lengthy criticism, and I thought I’d check out the claims about prices. What I found was that all their references were to raileurope.com, which is apparently an English language reseller catering to tourists. I tried going to the companies’ official sites, and wouldn’t you know it: the tickets were cheaper– in some cases, significantly cheaper.
I tried it again just now, for Paris-Avignon. This Sunday: raileurope has its cheapest ticket at $99. Voyages-sncf had tickets on the same train–first class, apparently–for 55€, or $73. Voyages was also happy to show a calendar of which dates there are discount tickets available (the others presumably being sold out). May 9 has 40€ tickets ($53)–which raileurope.com offers for $99– and many dates have tickets for less than 50€.
I don’t know whether the people at CC-HSR were malicious or incompetent, though I suppose some of the blame lies with SNCF for failing to provide a good English-language site.
“though I suppose some of the blame lies with SNCF for failing to provide a good English-language site.”
Well, depends if you consider http://www.tgv-europe.com a good English-language site, although from your post I assume you didn’t know about it.
Not to mention the fact that if you book significantly in advance, you get even lower fares — Direct trains from Paris to Avignon on 16 August, for instance, are €30 to €39.90 in the morning.
Actually, no! Tgv-europe.com redirects to raileurope.com if you click “America” as your country of residence, so my point stands. Although when you price in euros, they raileurope offers the same regular prices– it looks like when they switch to dollars they use a lousy exchange rate which increases prices some 7%. But they still don’t offer any discount fares.
Sorry– should have attached this reply to ComradeFrana’s comment.
[…] their numbers just don’t check out, says Network blog Systemic Failure: CC-HSR extrapolated a 10-cent operating cost per passenger mile based on the the published $81 […]
“though I suppose some of the blame lies with SNCF for failing to provide a good English-language site.”
Why would any blame lie with SNCF for not providing an English site? It’s France, where they speak French. I’ve bought TGV tickets on their site – it’s not rocket science. Clearly 100% of the blame likes with CC-HSR.
[…] costs for High Speed Rail won’t be nearly as high as opponents claim. (Systemic […]
[…] BBVA data made no sense whatsoever, and someone at the CHSRA tracked down the error: Rail board member Mike Rossi told a […]
[…] High Speed Rail Operating Costs (systemicfailure.wordpress.com) […]
[…] High Speed Rail Operating Costs (systemicfailure.wordpress.com) […]